I have seen crazy things being said online about this project. People talking about it without having any clue about what Shellter really is (doing).
The funniest thing about it, is when people actually blame the tool itself while they totally use it in the wrong way; feeding to the tool whatever might come to their head. NO KIDDING!
What Shellter is NOT:
i) packer
ii) crypter
iii) executable obfuscator
iv) whatever you think it is
In the upcoming version of Shellter, most of the updates are mostly related to extra input validations, so not really visible from the user’s point of view.
However, the upcoming version will directly support domain names for the LHOST parameter of the reverse connection payloads.
So in case you really needed to use a domain name, you won’t have anymore to generate the shellcode from metasploit.
Unless of course you are using a payload not integrated in Shellter.
This is basically the most requested feature by the community, and hopefully will be available quite soon.
Cheers,
kyREcon